<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://esoterictechie.com/reviews/star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://esoterictechie.com/reviews/star-trek/</link>
	<description>Mysteries are not necessarily miracles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://esoterictechie.com/reviews/star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoterictechie.com/?p=446#comment-87</guid>
		<description>At first, I thought Joe had written this, and I commented as such on his FB notes, so I am copying my comment and leaving it for its rightful owner!

Nicely done.

I was no huge fan of the series, but I watched my fill enough to feel leery that the canon might be treated badly when this movie came out (just as I worry about all the established canons that movie-makers pillage and destroy. See entry: Joe&#039;s childhood, Michael Bay sets out to ruin).

I was impressed with it in the end, but there were several plot points that were little bit too quick and a little bit too convenient to be a totally believable back-story. I love Lost, but the same &#039;hey look! mystery/shiny&#039; technique was used to distract anyone who might question these plot points from further inquiry. You mention all the ones that bothered me and more I hadn&#039;t considered.... See More

All in all, I&#039;d say it was fairly well done and serves the added purpose of reviving interest in old school Trek, so I can&#039;t complain. Though I&#039;m not a die-hard fan, it might make die-hard fans happy to see a new breed in love with their old favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first, I thought Joe had written this, and I commented as such on his FB notes, so I am copying my comment and leaving it for its rightful owner!</p>
<p>Nicely done.</p>
<p>I was no huge fan of the series, but I watched my fill enough to feel leery that the canon might be treated badly when this movie came out (just as I worry about all the established canons that movie-makers pillage and destroy. See entry: Joe&#8217;s childhood, Michael Bay sets out to ruin).</p>
<p>I was impressed with it in the end, but there were several plot points that were little bit too quick and a little bit too convenient to be a totally believable back-story. I love Lost, but the same &#8216;hey look! mystery/shiny&#8217; technique was used to distract anyone who might question these plot points from further inquiry. You mention all the ones that bothered me and more I hadn&#8217;t considered&#8230;. See More</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;d say it was fairly well done and serves the added purpose of reviving interest in old school Trek, so I can&#8217;t complain. Though I&#8217;m not a die-hard fan, it might make die-hard fans happy to see a new breed in love with their old favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

